|
693 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Medium | Support for external references (XREF) | Likely to be implemented | |
28 |
Task Description
Support for external references (XREF)
|
|
1811 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Zoom 1:1 | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
It would be nice to be able to adjust the zoom factor so that the scale on the screen matches a ruler which I lay on the screen.
Thanks!
|
|
1506 | dxflib | Feature Request | Low | writeVPort parameters | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Add parameters to the function DL_Dxf::writeVPort. This way users will be able to specify the desired viewport.
Is the github the official repository? Are pull requests sent there accepted?
|
|
1863 | ECMAScript | Feature Request | Low | WidgetFactory.saveState: save state of checkable QGroup... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
QGroupBox widgets with <property name=”checkable”> are not saved in Qcad3.conf
|
|
637 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Viewports / View List | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
1. The Scrollbars for each window in the Viewports has the same size like the normal used scrollbars for windows. If you are working on a normal size Monitor it “steals” a lot of “working space”. Is there any possibility to make the scrollbars smaller or just a line to separate the windows so that I have to navigate with Keyboard and mouse?
2. I thing the Viewports and the View List belongs together - is it possible to get a button in the “View List / Tool Bar” to choose a Viewport style instead of “walking” the long way over the “Drawing preferences” Menu?
See also: http://www.ribbonsoft.com/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=2071
|
|
1999 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Viewport: Add additional properties for controlling dim... | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
When working with multiple Viewports with different scale it could be very useful to have extra properties controlling how dimensions are rendered in the viewport:
1) E.g an extra “Dimension Scale” under “Scale” in the Viewport selection’s ‘Specific Properties’ section, could allow having the same size when printed. This Dimension Scale would be multiplied on top of the Scale value, but only for Dimensions rendering.
2) Toggle button for hiding any dimensions in the Viewport. Maybe this should be controlled by being able to specify a Layer that should be hidden in this Viewport only, then I could select my Dimensions layer here.
The Viewport properties: https://i.imgur.com/s07JtaB.png
|
|
2308 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Viewport Scale Field | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
It would be helpful if the scale field that appears while placing a viewport would also re-appear when the viewport is selected after it’s already been placed in the layout. It would also be helpful if the pre-populated values in the dropdown matched those in the global layout scale field.
|
|
1541 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | View > Zoom > Zoom In/Out: Make zoom factor configurabl... | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=4729
|
|
1596 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | View > Selection Filter: add filter for custom properti... | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
See also: https://qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=4840
|
|
1133 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | View > Add View: save layer state | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
Save layer state (visibility) with each added view object (optional?).
|
|
2189 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Vertically and/or diagonally stacked fractions option. | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
The option for vertically and diagonally stacked fractions would be helpful for both the text creation tool and as the output of dimensions.
|
|
802 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | User defined toolbar | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
It would be a nice feature to be able to define your own toolbar.
See: http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=2393
|
|
618 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | user defined lineweight | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
To have the option to set your own ‘user defined’ line weight.
|
|
694 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | User coordinate systems (UCS) | Assigned | |
13 |
Task Description
UCS support.
|
|
724 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Useless reference point entering when moving relatively | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
Hi, this is a usability feature request:
If you want to move an object relatively to any point (e.g. by entering @x;y in commandline) it does’nt make sense to enter a starting reference point. Of course this is possible by clicking to any location on the screen. But it’s difficult to change between mouse and keyboard so often.
It should be possible to enter a “don’t care” or “any” reference point by pressing a keyboard shortcut (e.g. enter like in AutoCAD).
Thx
|
|
827 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Use Properties Editor to define Properties of newly cre... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
If there is no selection the Properties Editor could be used to predefine the properties of to be drawn elements.
|
|
1131 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Use different units for construction and dimensions | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
E.g. use Millimeters for construction while dimensions are displayed in Meters.
|
|
821 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Underline text option | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Feature request - to have an option to underline text.
|
|
779 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Turning detailed view on/off | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
My system: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 650 @ 3.20GHz and 8 GB of RAM and NVIDIA GT218 (GeForce 210)
For a normal drawing displaying it in all detail is a good thing and the performance of my quad-core system is more than adequate.
But I discovered (or rather experienced) that when putting a large collection of individual drawings of gears onto one big sheet (960 mm x 600 mm - preparation for laser cutting), the performance was so bad that I had to wait several seconds (>10 sec) for each step in the process of arranging all the parts on the layer.
Request: It would be a big help and performance booster if you could disable the detailed view of each part/layer and only draw a rectangle to visualize the outline of the part.
Please take this in consideration. Attached you find an example of how that could look like. (Actually when pasting a drawing from the clipboard you already do that.)
|
|
784 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Turn text into hatched polylines | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
Would it be possible to add a feature which turns selected text into solid fill hatched polylines?
That would make it possible to migrate the drawing from one computer system to another without having to worry whether the used font is installed on both systems, like when sending a drawing to a manufacturer for laser engraving.
Right now I can do it by hand, letter by letter, and that is a rather labour-intensive task.
|
|
1983 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Trim All or Bulk Break out | Assigned | |
4 |
Task Description
This is a trim method I am missing in Qcad.
20 years ago it existed in CadKey. You had a bunch of lines or segments. You defined a (new) line or segment as cutter. ‘Trim All’. You pointed at the side of the cutter entity to trim all intersecting at that side.
Pritty the same as in this topic: https://qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?t=5221
Only in rare cases I can use Husky’s workaround as pro. It all depends on what else is in the clipping rectangle that is needed to trim all intended. If of no use all single crossing entities have to be chosen one by one.
Regards, CVH
|
|
2307 | QCAD/CAM | Feature Request | Low | Tools to create dogbones or corner overcut | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
The inside corners of profile tool paths have rounded inside corners. This occurs because the rounded outside the bit cannot make it all the way into the corner of the feature. Think of tracing the inside wall of a cardboard box with a can of soup. The can makes direct contact with the box walls, but its round shape is unable to completely fit into the tight corners— there’s always a gap.
In a dog-bone overcut (see the figure in attachment), the inside profile corner is enlarged into a semicircle, allowing the sharp edges of the mating piece to slide through without interference.
When a dog bone is applied to the inside corners, as shown in the second figure in the attachment, the joints fit together nicely!
The following website explains what should be implemented More elegant CNC dogbones
There are two ways to implement this tool. Either you modify the original design (as implemented in Fusion 360) or you can do it at the moment you define the tool path (Estlcam allows you to do this for example). See the feature Corner overcut, on Estlcam website
|
|
1846 | QCAD/CAM | Feature Request | Low | Toolpath preset offsets | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Hi Andrew
A request for adding some fields to the toolpath
|
|
2330 | QCAD/CAM | Feature Request | Low | Toolpath optimization optional (on/off) | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Please refer to: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=9033
|
|
2471 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Tool request: Arc - 2 Tangents and radius ... | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
... inclusive trim option
I’m already able to use the Circle tool “2 Tangents and radius” to accomplish this task but it is a lot of break out etc. action needed to clean the shape afterward.
|
|
1594 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Tool matrix: allow reordering of tools | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=4923
|
|
596 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Tool "Lengthen" mit "Total" erweitern oder .... | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
Eine oft Hilfreiche Zeit/Klick sparende Erweiterung wäre eine “Total” Option bei dem “Lengthen” Tool.
Aktuell ist es mit dieser Funktion möglich ein Element zu verlängern oder zu verkürzen um den Amount X. Der Referenzpunkt (von welchem Ende) kann bestimmt werden.
Die Erweiterung die ich mir wünschen würde wäre auch ein “Total” um ein Element auf eine bestimmte Länge zu bringen ohne einen Taschenrechner benutzen zu müssen. Referenz (welches Ende oder Mitte) sollte (muss) dafür wählbar sein.
Die Funktion “Property editor” stellt bereits über die Geometry Eigenschaften die Möglichkeit zur Verfügung einen “Total” Wert zu manipulieren. Leider bin ich aber hierbei nicht in der Lage zu bestimmen welcher Element Referenzpunkt dafür benutzt werden soll. Könnte ich die Referenz wählen (welches Ende oder Mitte) wäre auch dies dann durchaus akzeptabel
|
|
2091 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Toggle redrawing of hatches | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Because modifying hatches have lag issues I’d like to propose a toggle that turns of the redrawing/rendering of the hatch. Especially while modifying the hatch.
The hatches always have a boundary that can be worked with right? So when we move or stretch the hatch we can still see the boundary and its handles to perform all the actions.
This could be a new view mode that turns of the view of the interior/pattern of the hatch but leave the boundary of the hatch. Or the draft mode can be extended to include simplified hatches while modifying.
Also see the discussion
|
|
708 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | To re-introduce Tile and Cascade window options | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
To re-introduce Tile and Cascade window options like as before in QCAD 2.2.2.
|
|
674 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | To add optional 'auto' dimension tracking feature. | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
It might be useful for some to have the option to turn on/off ' auto’ dimension tracking option.
See related topic: http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=2&p=6893#p6893
|
|
516 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | To add option to 'print only' selected area. | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
To add the option to ‘print only’ selected area in a drawing.
|
|
1128 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Text: automatically wrap text at text box width | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Add support for automatic text line wrapping for multiline text entities.
|
|
979 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Text dialog: insert special characters in simple text m... | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
The Omega button to insert special characters is only available in rich text mode. Make it available in simple text mode as well.
|
|
2456 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Tangent arc | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
It would be great if QCAD could create an arc tangent to another entity without necessity to type a radius. Just two simple steps: 1. Click the endpoint of another entity to start the arc. The arc is tangent to the starting entity. 2. Click the second point to place the arc.
|
|
2331 | QCAD/CAM | Feature Request | Low | Tabs: Control over on which particular profile used. | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Currently if I position one Tab (KT) to stacked profiles QCADCAM will use it on ALL in Z matching profiles. Practically in most cases would be to use tabs only on the lowest profile.
It would be nice to have some kind of control on which profile a tab has to be used.
|
|
1233 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Tab key to cycle between selected objects | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
I think it’s a useful adition and makes it easy to select objects that are overlapped. I know there is a selection filter, but sometimes this is faster and/or all the objects share the same type and such things.
If I remember correctly, Inkscape has this behaviour.
Thanks.
|
|
208 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | SVG export: support custom line weights | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Find way to support custom line weights for SVG export. See also forum thread: http://www.ribbonsoft.com/rsforum/viewtopic.php?t=1594
|
|
2272 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Support unit "US survey foot" | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
In the US, it is (unfortunately) still common to use US survey foot. It seems at least some DXF applications/libraries support this unit as a $INSUNITS value, some references:
There are two issues regarding this with QCAD:
If you open a document with $INSUNITS being 21, it’s reset to 0 (unitless/unspecified) when saved again, even when not changing anything.
It is not possible to select these units in the GUI.
I don’t know about standardization of these values, but my hope is that it’s at least possible to preserve the unit in an existing drawing. Given that this unit is supposed to be obsolete in some years, it might seem less important, but due to this transition, it might get even more important to be able to distinguish between units. Thanks!
|
|
598 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Support tangents between ellipses | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
To add support for drawing tangents between ellipses.
See topic: http://www.ribbonsoft.com/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=2003
|
|
1098 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Support for set of layers | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Many constructions refer to a basis of elements, which stay constant in all follow-ups. As an example there is a floorplan and I would like to create different variations of room layout (e.g. A and B). In my example the basis consists of 30 layers an each variation needs 10 further ones. At last there are 50 different layers in my drawing. Designing layout A needs layer 1 to 30 (basis) and 31 to 40 (A) to be shown, but 41 to 50 (B) must be invisible. Now I modify Var.B which makes me to single click the visibility of 31 to 40 (A) to be not shown and 41 to 50 (B) to be shown. You’ve got it?
It would be great help, to save the set of all shown layers by an individual name in a pulldown-menu. Visibility of my variations could be chosen by userdefined “set of layers”, e.g. “Var-A”, “Var-B” and “Var-A_but_different”. In this way I pick just one set-name in my pulldown-list instead of marking and demarking between countless layers.
In my opinion this tool would be a small aspect in QCad but a giant leap for user-pleasentness
|
|
2037 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Support alternative angle reference | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
E.g. 0 degrees at the top, clock-wise for positive direction, alternative angle units.
|
|
1886 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Support advanced tolerance settings for dimensions | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Add support for - tolerance display (dimtol) - upper limit (dimtp) - lower limit (dimtm) - tolerance precision (dimtdec) - tolerance text size factor (dimtfac) - tolerance suppress zeros, etc.
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=6269
|
|
1034 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Supplementary note added to Application preferences dia... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
I think it would be useful to add a note to the Application preferences dialog window, to explain to the user the difference between ‘Application and Drawing’ preferences and how it effects drawings in QCAD.
Please see topic for more details and feedback:
http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=2831&p=9724#p9724
|
|
1126 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Suggestion for Dimension Location setting | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
Please seet topic:
http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=3124
|
|
1407 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Splines: add support for knot weights, start-, end tang... | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
Attached DWG/DXF files are incorrectly read by QCAD. They contain splines drawn using ZWCAD and saved as DWG/DXF version 2000. Above splines are polylines created with autolisp routine which converts spline to polyline, so you can see how splines should actually be drawn.
First spline is created with fit points: 2,2 4,4 6,2 Then copied and applied weight of 2 on central control point. Then copied again and applied weight of 0.5 on central control point.
Second spline is created with fit points: 6,2 8,4 10,2 with vertical start and end tangent. Then copied and applied fit tolerance of 1 for fit points.
Third spline is created with fit points: 10,2 12,4 14,2 with horizontal start and end tangent.
Fourth and fifth spline are correctly drawn by QCAD.
Link to bitmap (converted to png) export: External Link
Versions QCAD version: 3.13.1.0 Date: Mar 17 2016 Qt version: 4.8.4 Compiler version: gcc 4.4.3 Build Date: Mar 17 2016 Revision: Architecture: x86_64 OS: Linux OS version: Unknown
|
|
1107 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Splines: add / remove control points of existing spline... | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Tools to add control points to existing splines and remove control points.
|
|
1428 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Snap middle of the minimum distance between two entity'... | Assigned | |
5 |
Task Description
Hi,
from time to time I need to place a circle etc precisely between two entity’s - what is a lot of construction work to get it correct. With the new “Info tool “Distance Entity to Entity” we have already the base for a new snap tool which could help to get rid of the time consuming construction process in cases like this. I would appreciate to get a new snap tool which is able to figure out the shortest distance between to entity’s and then will snap to the middle of it.
Pic 1: Given situation Pic 2: Result after using this new snap tool
Would it make also cense to have a second new snap tool which works opposite for the furthermost distance between two entity’s?
|
|
2127 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Snap for predicted intersections while using "Restrict ... | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
I would like to request a new kind of snap: a “Restricted Intersection” snap that appears at the point where an entity would intersect with a line drawn from Relative Zero that fulfills the current EL criteria. “Restricted Intersection” snaps would be similar to other Relative Zero-based snaps (like “Perpendicular” and “Tangential”), but would predict the point of the snap from the EL constraints instead of the characteristics of the entity being snapped to. Naturally a value of 0 for angle or length would result in that constraint being ignored.
Additional operational flexibility could be achieved by allowing the snap to exist regardless of whether EL is actually in use. To be useful this would probably require determining snap locations based on angle OR length as opposed to angle AND length.
Implementing this new snap would allow, for example, for easily drawing a line of unknown (but determinable) length at a specified angle between a given point and a given entity (see discussion here), with the “Restricted Intersection” snap ensuring that the endpoint of the new line forms an intersection with the entity in question. Currently the same goal can be achieved a couple of different ways, but they all involve at least two separate steps.
|
|
817 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Snap and cut all intersection in a given area tool ... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
As we all know - from time to time - it is a lot of work to prepare a part of a drawing for a hatch. To get rid of one of the basic task (cutting lines along the desired hatch boundary) it would be nice to have an add-on - or what ever - what would cut ALL intersection in a drawing (or just on one layer, or just based on a selection etc.) with just a mouse click. Then it would be much faster and easier to do the selection for the hatch boundaries. The user could decide to make it directly in his drawing or he like to duplicate the drawing to an extra layer where this function will be used ....
Clive mentioned on this: Maybe a tool like this could be an additional ‘Snap’ selection option - select all snap intersections or select snap intersections within a boundary! then as you suggest ‘cut’ at the intersection points.
|
|
1878 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Snap > Distances from 2 Points: snap to point with give... | Assigned | |
1 |
Task Description
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/posting.php?mode=reply&f=32&t=6211
|