|
1552 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Layers: assign different color for printing | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Original request:
https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=4768
|
|
1567 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Add support for separate window | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Hi, for multi-screen hosts it would be very useful to have additional windows while running the single QCad instance. Other applications like Palemoon, Evolution, Gimp are providing that already. That would help a lot when working on multiple files and copying blocks between.
|
|
1627 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | revision cloud | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
how do i draw revision cloud in Qcad pro or when do you will implemented it
|
|
1663 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Feature Request: Export Layers as New Drawing | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Hi!
in many tasks in qcad I ended up exporting one or several layers into individual files for some cnc jobs or further processing. So the steps I usually do are:
select all elements on the layer
paste into new drawing
sometimes rename layer names or attributes
adjust dimension settings
save and give name for drawing
Sometimes I have up to 100 layers I need to export like this, so an automatic export for all would be time saving too. But very often a “single click” export method would also help a lot. (e.g. inside the layer list an entry in the right click menue like “save as new file”). Also a multiple selection would be handy if more that one layer should end up in the new file. (e.g. select the three layers that need to be in the new document, then right click and save as new file). Maybe this is too much of changes needed inside the layer list - so something like a separate layer export dialogue would make sense.
When exporting many layers some variables for automatic naming of layers and filename would make sense e.g. user can specify basename_%L.dxf to get the basename_layername.dxf or just an increasing number.
For layers and attributes it is often needed to give a layer a certain name or color for different cnc processes (e.g. engraving and cutting for lasers) or to put everything on layer “0” because of some old CAM software that only supports content on layer 0.
probably many more details would make sense that I didn’t think of yet...
kind regards Martin
|
|
1674 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Layouts and Viewports: duplicate layout block | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Duplicate layout blocks
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=89&t=5241
|
|
1886 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Support advanced tolerance settings for dimensions | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Add support for - tolerance display (dimtol) - upper limit (dimtp) - lower limit (dimtm) - tolerance precision (dimtdec) - tolerance text size factor (dimtfac) - tolerance suppress zeros, etc.
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=6269
|
|
1887 | dwg2bmp | Feature Request | Low | Add "-max-lineweight" option for dwg2bmp | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Hi there,
A friendly request to add the option to set a maximum lineweight for raster conversions via dwg2bmp.
Depending on the LW configuration of the CAD file, rasterization operations sometimes yield terrible results (see attachment). This would also mirror the similar “-min-lineweight” options available on “dwg2svg” and “dwg2pdf” (although not on “dwg2bmp”).
See also: https://qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=6298
Thanks!
|
|
1983 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Trim All or Bulk Break out | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
This is a trim method I am missing in Qcad.
20 years ago it existed in CadKey. You had a bunch of lines or segments. You defined a (new) line or segment as cutter. ‘Trim All’. You pointed at the side of the cutter entity to trim all intersecting at that side.
Pritty the same as in this topic: https://qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?t=5221
Only in rare cases I can use Husky’s workaround as pro. It all depends on what else is in the clipping rectangle that is needed to trim all intended. If of no use all single crossing entities have to be chosen one by one.
Regards, CVH
|
|
2063 | QCAD (main) | Performance Issue | Low | Bad performance while zooming inside layout block with ... | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Zooming in and out is lagging to the point of unusable. This is happening in a layout block with the cursor pointing inside geometry with hatches. When the cursor is pointing outside the geometry zooming works as expected. The attached file has a very simplified testcase that shows this problem almost in the same way as a more complex drawing with multiple layers and hatches.
edit: I also attached the more complex drawing because it is a bit unclear to me where the lagging stops. Outside the viewport or outside the paper.
I just noticed the selection box has the same problem!
|
|
2091 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Toggle redrawing of hatches | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Because modifying hatches have lag issues I’d like to propose a toggle that turns of the redrawing/rendering of the hatch. Especially while modifying the hatch.
The hatches always have a boundary that can be worked with right? So when we move or stretch the hatch we can still see the boundary and its handles to perform all the actions.
This could be a new view mode that turns of the view of the interior/pattern of the hatch but leave the boundary of the hatch. Or the draft mode can be extended to include simplified hatches while modifying.
Also see the discussion
|
|
2127 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Snap for predicted intersections while using "Restrict ... | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
I would like to request a new kind of snap: a “Restricted Intersection” snap that appears at the point where an entity would intersect with a line drawn from Relative Zero that fulfills the current EL criteria. “Restricted Intersection” snaps would be similar to other Relative Zero-based snaps (like “Perpendicular” and “Tangential”), but would predict the point of the snap from the EL constraints instead of the characteristics of the entity being snapped to. Naturally a value of 0 for angle or length would result in that constraint being ignored.
Additional operational flexibility could be achieved by allowing the snap to exist regardless of whether EL is actually in use. To be useful this would probably require determining snap locations based on angle OR length as opposed to angle AND length.
Implementing this new snap would allow, for example, for easily drawing a line of unknown (but determinable) length at a specified angle between a given point and a given entity (see discussion here), with the “Restricted Intersection” snap ensuring that the endpoint of the new line forms an intersection with the entity in question. Currently the same goal can be achieved a couple of different ways, but they all involve at least two separate steps.
|
|
2128 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | "Create Library Item" "Save As" dialogue doesn't rememb... | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
This is either a bug or a feature request, depending on perspective; my apologies if I’ve picked the wrong one. Additional discussion can be found here.
Steps to reproduce: 1. Create an entity 2. Run “Create Library Item” [BT] 3. Select Reference Point
Expected outcome: “Save As” dialogue opens in the directory that the previous library item was saved in
Actual outcome: “Save As” dialogue opens in ( RSettings.getLaunchPath() + “/libraries” )
Additional Context: The reason I’ve categorized this as a bug is because, relative to the behaviour of the main “Save As” dialogue (which does remember the last directory used) the behaviour of the “Create Library Item” “Save As” dialogue is unexpected.
Software versions: QCAD 3.25.2 Pro Windows 10 Pro
|
|
2173 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | View > Selection Filter: Add alpha property for hatches | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Add alpha property to filter for hatches.
|
|
2182 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Select > Select Previous | Assigned | |
2 |
Task Description
Select the previously selected entities.
|
|
228 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Insert current date (and other fields) | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
Insert field into drawing that displays current date, file name, ...
|
|
704 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Old Hatch Function | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
It would be nice to implement the old hatch function as a tile function in parallel with the newer more industry standard hatch function. A tile function that would allow overlap +/- would be even better, and a great productivity boost, almost like an array within a set of bounds.
Thanks, Bob
|
|
734 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Possibility to distribute a selection equal to each oth... | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
It would be nice to have an extra option for the Align tool what provides the possibility to an equal distribution of a selection ...
Screenshot: First row: Befor / Second row: after
|
|
741 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | An additional Radius Measurement tool ... | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
It would be nice to have an additional Radius Measurement tool with short leads. The current Radius tool shows always the lead line to the center of the radius what is in many cases not useful.
I’m not asking for a workaround
|
|
766 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Layer List: Add "Lock All Layers" | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
To improve useability/efficiency I would like to propose the following changes/additions to the layer list:
1) Combining the show and hide button into one button.
Clicking once will hide all layers, clicking again will show them all again.
2) A “lock/unlock” button.
Clicking once will lock all layers, clicking again will unlock them all again.
Regarding the icons I suggest that instead of show both the black and grey version of the eye/lock, you could switch between them depending on the state the switch-button is in. Also the mouse-over-text could/should change with the state.
|
|
952 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Dimensions: manually control arrow position | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
See drawing: I can’t seem to be able to manually change to the “To” variants – that is, override the decision of the label/arrow placement engine.
The circle in the attachment is a borderline example of when even just in this form I would more like it on the outside. If the drawing is crowded in that area, it would be even more useful to have it the other way around.
|
|
1126 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Suggestion for Dimension Location setting | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
Please seet topic:
http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=3124
|
|
1171 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Selecting the right entity when entities are close / on... | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
Please see last few posts here:
http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=3227&p=11777#p11777
|
|
1206 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Link drawings with each other to update layers, blocks | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
See: http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=3410
|
|
1470 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Double line tool request | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
I would love to have a ‘Double Line’ tool in QCAD.
For me this would be such a time saver when drawing out building floor plans in QCAD.
|
|
1628 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Move / Copy and snap tangential | Assigned | |
3 |
Task Description
Please see:
https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=5024#p18601
|
|
895 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Area calculation based on existing entities | Assigned | |
4 |
Task Description
Use case:
Start tool
Choose one entity of the contour
If contour is closed, area of closed contour is calculated an printed in the command line history
Configuration parameters: segment length for arc interpolation
|
|
1165 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | New Create Spiral Tool | Assigned | |
4 |
Task Description
A new tool to create Spirals would be great to have, with an option to restrict the decline to achieve to draw either Logarithmic or Linear styles.
Please see related topic:
http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=3236
|
|
1488 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Dimension text position | Assigned | |
4 |
Task Description
This one is a really important one for me, as currently I am doing a lot of dimension and annotation drawings. I would like to request an option to be added to the dimension settings for both drawing and application settings to be able to choose whether the dimension text is to the right or left side or over the top or underneath the dimension line. This would help tremendously when a lot of dimensions are needed!
Regards
Clive
|
|
1721 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Insert table tool | Assigned | |
4 |
Task Description
Hi Andrew,
I’m not sure whether this has been added or suggested already. It would be great to have a built in QCAD table tool for producing cutting lists or bill of materials etc. A dedicated table tool would be a real boost to QCAD Pro ;)
Many thanks
Clive
|
|
2018 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Layer visibility setting per view/view-port | Assigned | |
4 |
Task Description
In a medium complex drawing it’s often too much details to have all layers in a drawing visible at once. Also, it is of great importance to be able to have a single model to avoid duplication of work and risk inconsistency.
So i would like to create a number of views where each view has selected layers visible (that makes sense for the purpose of the view) and then assign the views to different layout blocks (using view-ports) in paper-space to be able to setup printing of several views on the same page/PDF
This also means that view-ports would have to be aware of what view they are displaying (if any besides the standard-view). This will then make it possible for printouts of different views with selected layers visible (different for each view and view-port) and still have only one model. Today this is not possible.
As it is today the only limited workaround is to set the layers you want to display, print/PDF of that viewport on separate page, and then change it for the next page, and so on. The big drawback is that you cannot have two different views/view-ports on the same page with different layers visible. Also, for large drawing it is painful to have to do a lot of manual setup for each rendering of the complete drawing.
|
|
778 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Remove multiple layers | Assigned | |
5 |
Task Description
It would be a nice feature to be able to select multiple layers to remove them all at once.
|
|
972 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Distribute equally option ... | Assigned | |
5 |
Task Description
It would be nice (and a time-saver!) to have an additional option in the alignment tool: Distribute entities / blocks equally.
|
|
1224 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Revision clouds | Likely to be implemented | |
5 |
Task Description
Add support to draw revision clouds or convert polylines, ellipses, circles to revision clouds.
|
|
1428 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Snap middle of the minimum distance between two entity'... | Assigned | |
5 |
Task Description
Hi,
from time to time I need to place a circle etc precisely between two entity’s - what is a lot of construction work to get it correct. With the new “Info tool “Distance Entity to Entity” we have already the base for a new snap tool which could help to get rid of the time consuming construction process in cases like this. I would appreciate to get a new snap tool which is able to figure out the shortest distance between to entity’s and then will snap to the middle of it.
Pic 1: Given situation Pic 2: Result after using this new snap tool
Would it make also cense to have a second new snap tool which works opposite for the furthermost distance between two entity’s?
|
|
1723 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Detecting overlapping line / arc segments | Assigned | |
5 |
Task Description
Add a tool to detect overlapping segments or lines and arcs. Similar like the “overkill” command in other CAD systems.
|
|
763 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | Hatching with just one click | Assigned | |
7 |
Task Description
My task: To hatch an area.
Right now, if I want to fill an area with a hatch pattern, I have to select all the enclosing objects (lines, arcs) and then I can select the hatch tool. That can be under some circumstances a tedious task. To illustrate this, I created a simple example (see Attachment 1: Hatching.png).
Step 1: Create a rectangle. Step 2: Draw four vertical lines. Step 3: Select the four lines surrounding the first area. –> Problem! The horizontal lines are too long. Step 4: Divide the long horizontal lines of the rectangle where the vertical lines touch. Now the lines surrounding the three areas can be selected. Step 5: Hatch the selection. Done.
Just for fun try recreating my second example (see Attachment 2: Hatching2.png)
Therefore I would like to suggest a far more simple approach.
Step 1: Select the Hatch Tool. Step 2: Click inside the area you would like to be hatched. Done.
Of course that would mean that the hatch style is already pre-defined and can be changed later, if needed.
In this way productivity can be increased by ... [fill in you own estimate] ... times.
Example 2 would need only 13 clicks to hatch all the areas (including the hatch tool button).
|
|
694 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Low | User coordinate systems (UCS) | Assigned | |
11 |
Task Description
UCS support.
|
|
991 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Very Low | Add warning when overwriting custom property | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Property Editor - Geometry - Custom - Add Custom Property
If I use an identical Name accidentally again in the Custom Property dialog - it will overwrite the first value with the same name without any warnings.
|
|
1426 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Very Low | Load drawings that were open when closing QCAD on start... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
See also: http://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=4249
|
|
1443 | QCAD (main) | Bug Report | Very Low | View > Status Bar remains unchecked | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Status Bar menu remains unchecked even it is toggled on or off
|
|
1649 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Very Low | Add configuarable format options for saving blocks to l... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Add configuarable format options in application preferences for saving blocks to library to either dxf or dwg.
|
|
1691 | QCAD (main) | Bug Report | Very Low | Issue with Layouts after "File-Revert" | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
QCad 3.19.2 Professional, 64bit, Liux Mint
Case: 1. Open some saved drawing with viewport entities on layout block (paper space). Print Preview mode is “On” automatically. 2. After “File-Revert” drawing is reopened on layout block (paper space), but now Print Previw mode is “Off” .
For example can try on “flange.dxf”
|
|
1719 | QCAD (main) | Bug Report | Very Low | Undo on converted drawing leads to wrong label position... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Drawing converted from inch to mm - undo leads to wrong dim label position. I can fix that with “Reset Label position” but it would be nice if QCAD could to that in first place.
|
|
1788 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Very Low | New snap: reference points of a block references | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
I know this was reported and fixed before ...
https://www.qcad.org/bugtracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=843
... but it looks like we have the issue now back with some kind of variation.
If I use the test drawing which I posted in 2013 ( FS#843 ) it works still as expected after it was fixed.
If I create a new block it won’t work in a new drawing nor in the old test drawing - no chance to snap to the Block Reference.
Edit: New Test drawing:
|
|
1900 | QCAD (main) | Bug Report | Very Low | Remote shares initially not accessible. | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
My data files are stored on network shares (synology) with a GB link. QCAD Pro is run in Admin mode.
While in my Windows browser all remote shares are accessible (Green), in the QCAD file open menu they are initially shown as not accessible (Red). By accessing a specific drawing file in a remote share, the share will open and turn green.
Same behavior using ‘Open recent’. Always the message is given that the requested file does not exist, and the file is wiped from the ‘Recent Open’ list. Only if the share is first accessed through ‘Open’ with a random file, it will turn and a ‘recent open’ file for that share will open.
Drag and Drop from a remote share will never work.
|
|
1905 | QCAD (main) | Bug Report | Very Low | View > Property Editor: Changing attribute of block cha... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=6367#p23947
|
|
1920 | QCAD (main) | Feature Request | Very Low | Edit > Application Preferences: Add preference to disab... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
See also: https://www.qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=89&t=6447
|
|
1922 | dwg2bmp | Feature Request | Very Low | Add error message when requesting raster for a non-exis... | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
It would be nice if QCAD spit some kind of warning message when trying to render a layer with a name that doesn’t exist (and perhaps render nothing), rather than silently rendering an empty image. :D
See https://qcad.org/rsforum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=6453
|
|
1974 | QCAD (main) | Bug Report | Very Low | File > Print Preview: Cannot move paper in new drawing | Unconfirmed | |
|
Task Description
Yesterday I set up a Windows 64 bit install of QCAD Pro which shows the same bug I have been seeing for a while in the Community linux git repo.
Create a new drawing and then go to “Print preview”. Enable “Move paper postion”, the cursor changes to the hand icon, but the paper position is unable to be moved. Only by saving the drawing, exiting the program, restarting and reopening the drawing, will the “Move paper postion” function correctly.
Affected versions tested:
Windows 64bit installer download, as of yesterday. Linux 64bit build from git, about 20minutes ago.
For what it’s worth, this bug is not present in this previous git checkout:
Version: 3.21.1.0 (3.21.1) Internet: QCAD.org Build Date: Jul 2 2018 Revision:
Qt Version: 5.7.0 Architecture: x86_64 Compiler: gcc 6.3.1
Thanks for a great product.
|
|
2011 | QCAD Community Edition | Suggestion | Very Low | Update QCAD CE SpatialIndex module to latest version | Assigned | |
|
Task Description
Building with the bundled version, 1.8.5, works fine.
When I try to build using the system version, which for Mageia Cauldron is 1.9.3, the build fails.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kekePower/mmbl/master/qcad/2019/12/11/20%3A13%3A48/log.qcad
Here is the current spec file for version 3.23.0.4. https://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/qcad/current/SPECS/qcad.spec?revision=1465894&view=markup
It looks like qcad is incompatible with versions above 1.8.5.
Are there plans to port to the new version?
Thanks in advance.
|