@ctdahlework,
Hi, and welcome to the QCAD forum.
Starting a new topic and referring to this post with a link would have been a better option.
Automatically, not really, QCAD does not know how to generate a correct 'airfoil'.
ctdahlework wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 12:32 am
I modified an existing drawing which was too short for the purpose.
With the original data I would try to get a nice fit with a fit-point spline.
Starting with some fit-points.
With the spline selected, dragging fit-points by their markers, adding/inserting additional fit-points if that is required.
Until the fit is acceptable.
To enlarge that, one could scale that up.
Scaling non-uniform to enlarge it more in one direction.
Not that this would be aerodynamically correct.
At the right there are 5 Arc shapes.
When selected and combined to a polyline ('Polyline from Selection' (
OC)) these are almost tangentially connected.
Slightly better at the right extreme (179.9997881 and 180.00021583 degrees or only 0.00021190 and 0.00021583 degrees off)
Less good for the highest and lowest point (179.85837827 and 180.06026577 degrees)
Only based on these differences -> Not 100% symmetrical.
Still, almost smooth.
At the left there are 2 fit-point splines that form somewhat of a sharp corner.
Fit-point splines end normal, 'relaxed'.
With only 3 points each, chances are that this results in a corner or in not tangentially connected.
It would be better as one symmetrical open ended fit-point spline with 5 points.
With the central point a little to the right.
As one complete spline it will also not be that easy because of the small radius on the right side.
Typically the fit-points must be more dense at high curvature and less dense at low curvature.
Store copies of intermediate results, of fit-point splines.
For example ... Except when undoing some of the last changes:
- An offset will typically be a polyline, a way back is almost impossible.
- Splitting/trimming a fit-point spline will result in a control-point spline, there is no reverse method.
Trash things that are no longer required in the long run.
Regards,
CVH