Creating Toolpath

[HJ Seef]

Hi, having some trouble with creating toolpaths from hatched lines.

[CVH]

Hi,

Note that DXF files can be attached directly to a post.
Spares us the trouble of downloading the ZIP and extract a DXF from in there.


In ArceerToolpath.dxf the source was a Hatch or a Hatch exploded to individual lines.
Best is to 'engrave' or mill these 'On path'.
Hatch lines are 1.905 units apart, best milling overlap is 30%.
But you use a laser and your laser spot is defined as 0.08 mm in diameter.

A Laser is turned on/off, a mill or an engraver point plunges down and retracts upwards.

Also remark that for zig-zag pocketing a contour, a finishing pass at the interior of the pocket is required.
The better option is continuous spiral pocketing but QCAD/CAM doesn't support pocketing out the box.
Alternative is: Pocketing with QCAD/CAM

Caution: The zig-zag pattern ends at the contour limit ... That is the center position for 'On path'.
As is, the islands may be 2x a half tool diameter narrower and the edge may be jagged.


In 250715_Triac_Module_B_Cu.dxf I can detect 1 Hatch on layer 'B_Hatch'.
It explodes to 12067 lines, 0.075 units apart.
Which profile is used to clear that area?

Are you going to vaporize copper with a Laser?

If a profile toolpath is not generated ...
... Perhaps the nearest neighbor algorithm to find an optimal processing sequence chokes.

Regards,
CVH

[CVH]

As is, the islands may be 2x a half tool diameter narrower and the edge may be jagged.

In 250715_Triac_Module_B_Cu.dxf try:
- Select hatch on layer 'B_Hatch'.
- Explode to lines (XP).
- Edit Layer 'B_Hatch'.
- Select a Lineweight that nearly matches your mill or laser spot diameter > 0.09mm.
- Turn off 'Screen-based Linetypes' (and weights) (NL)

The lines are rendered with a round pen mimicking your mill or laser spot diameter.

Regards,
CVH

[HJ Seef]

@CVH It's not the first time I'am using a 2,5W laser cutter to burn an thin alkyd paint layer from a PCB so it can be etched. The laser diameter is 0,10 mm. By setting it at 0,08 mm diameter, the overlay is 20%.

For 230 VAC- safety reasons the copper between the traces have to be removed.

One could use a lot of offset-outside-toolpaths with fictive diameters (see the tool list), but that is an awful lot of work, and it wil not remove all the in between copper.

Pocketing would be realy be nice, however .... QCAD/CAM does not support it (realy a missing feature!).

In the workflow, to make sharp traces they are lasered first with an Inside and Outside toolpath. Next, the copper between the traces have to be removed. As a solution I try to use a lined hatch pattern with an On-toolpath. I tried and tested this solution witch ArceerToolpath.dxf. That works fine.

However, in the PCB design 250715_Triac_Module_B_Cu.dxf the same solution is aborted.

=> " It explodes to 12067 lines, 0.075 units apart. ", is what it should do. Whenever I try to explode the hatch, it disappears completely.

Why can I create toolpath with the test-drawing and not on the PCB?

[CVH]

Whenever I try to explode the hatch, it disappears completely.

It is simply not rendered because such things may slow down QCAD to a crawl.
It seems indeed that a not rendered Hatch entity is exploded to nothing ...
... Kinda a bug. Not rendering is one thing, not exploding to line-art is another aspect.

See Application Preferences .. Graphics View .. Appearance .. Timeout for hatch rendering (Scroll down)
Increase the Timeout (ms)

QCAD(/CAM) may already become unstable or crash.

Pocketing would be realy be nice, however .... QCAD/CAM does not support it (realy a missing feature!).

Parallel offsets are generated automatically but the result may have flaws.
The area to clean is the Hatch set as solid and then exploded to outer contours.
Your pocket might be too complex.

Also follow the links included under 'Pocketing with QCAD/CAM'?
My CNC driver has a CAM build in that mostly does a fine job. (Windows only)
The G-code of the pocket can be reloaded by QCAD for a profile 'on path'.

Why can I create toolpath with the test-drawing and not on the PCB?

I think I may already answered that.
Divide an concur can be a solution if the Hatch is too large, too complex.

Regards,
CVH

[CVH]

One could use a lot of offset-outside-toolpaths

Yes, about 90 parallel offsets may do the trick, see menu Draw .. Polyline .. Offset (OQ)
Select all boundary contours from the Hatch exploded as solid.
Opt for 0.075 apart + 90 offsets + mode 'Offset Whole Polyline' + 'Round Join' + Clipping in the Option Toolbar.
Then indicate near one of the contours at the inside of the required pocket and activate the tool.
Set a pot of coffee in the mean time

Not that difficult in itself ... Fixing the offset errors can indeed be an awful lot of work

QCAD may stall ... Then do only 5 offsets or so at once and restart with selecting the inner parallel paths.
The number of offsets can be increased in successive steps.

Attempted this with QCAD 3.32.4 just to check if QCAD offsets are flawless these days.
They are not, had to correct many things even with successive steps.

250715_Triac_Module_B_Cu.Hatch.dxf

Merely the offsets, not a QCAD/CAM file

(3.45 MiB) Downloaded 80 times

Resulting in 1248 Polylines, by eliminating re-tracing 1215 are logically closed the rest are single strokes.
What is about 10% of the zigzag entity count and thus 89.66% less tool-paths to sequence for the pocket profile.
Total travel is a little shorter: 74.853 instead of 76.180 meters.
As said, your zigzag travels too near to the pocket edges.

... it wil not remove all the in between copper.

It will clear the pockets completely if done correctly.
30% overlap with a cutter means that only about 1/3 of a cutter is engaged with virgin material.
0.075 apart with a 0.10 diameter tool is 75% engaged with virgin material.

That will indeed leave some spots 'uncut' at offsets with very acute angles.
(Turn off Screen-based Linetypes (NL) ... The offsets layer uses a 0.09mm pen ... 0.10mm is not an option)

Your zigzag approach has another draw-back.
A hatch origin is typically the drawing origin after creation, lines are evenly spaced in regards with that.
It can be set so that one of the horizontal lines is exactly 0.05 away from a pocket boundary.
In no way you can prevent that any other is much less than 0.05 away from another edge.

The best approach:
- First define a set of finishing paths as an 1/2 tool diameter or 0.05 offset to all the pockets boundaries at once.
Intended for the final pass.
- Then define a set of areas to clear with pocketing that is 1/3 tool diameter smaller than the finishing paths.
Preferable with a larger tool if that is an option.
- Pocket or hatch these areas what will not over-cut the boundaries.

When milling we would use a larger mill for the roughing what are less and shorter paths, in all it is faster

If I can spare the time I may attempt spiraling pocketing ...

Regards,
CVH